Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wallacestevens who wrote (694)	8/25/1998 11:59:00 AM
From: Dovi	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

To a Certified Liberal: Since I don't seem to meet any liberals I need to ask the following question on this board. How are the Jennifer Willey accusations different than Anita Hill? Both stated that their boss engaged in behavior that would constitute sexual harrassment. Neither one brought suit at the time and even continued to work for the alleged harrasser. They seem to be very professional woman who would not normally make such claims. In fact, Willey may be more credible in the sense that she had no poilitical angle. She was a fundraiser for Clinton, thus there is no way she is part of some right wing conspiracy. Hill, on the other hand, defintely disagreed with the politics of Thomas. Given that Clinton lied about Lewinsky, why is he given the benefit of the doubt? Based on the facts we know he is a "horndog" and I find it likely that Willey is telling the truth. At least as likely as Anita Hill. The question is, Where is the outrage of you libs??!!! How can Thomas be unfit to serve on the supreme court while clinton remains as president? I want demonstrations in front of the white house and graffiti (like the anita hill on the side of the building on conecticut and calvert in D.C.) deploring the actions of the president. Paticia Ireland said she is waiting of the willey accusations to be "proven." Don't think Hill ever "proved" anything but she got immediate support. By nature these things are she said, he said affairs. Please, enlighten me and tell my why the libs don't look like hypocrites now. thanks.