To: Cliff Daniel who wrote (4413 ) 8/25/1998 4:47:00 PM From: Michael T Currie Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 15313
>> Ask me any question old buddy. I will be glad to answer them all truthfully. As long as they are on topic. OK, I'll give it a try in the interest of promoting an honest, stimulating conversation. These are some of the questions asked of you recently to which you responded either obliquely or not at all: > I'm curious about which penny stock scam companies you're aware of that were incorporated in Nevada? - post 4304 > Which pennies? I'm really curious. It's my honest suspicion that you heard somewhere to watch out for Nevada corporations because only scammers incorporate in Nevada. I would expect you to be able to come up with a couple scam penny stocks off the top of your head, if you truly know Nevada to be a haven for scam penny stocks. - post 4310 > Hi Cliff, You seem to have all this negative stuff lined up and well orchestrated. What's your goal in doing this ? - post 4355 > You being a Canadian Cliff, are you shorting this stock? - post 4356 > Have you spoken with either MS or her directly about some of your questions and concerns????? - post 4371 > CALL AND ASK. Do you ever do any of your own legwork? - post 4383 > Why don't you call the company and ask them why they made the hardware purchasing decisions that they did, and make your suggestions. Maybe they'll hire you. You apprear to have plenty of free time.- post 4385 > Have you or will you call FNTN and talk to MS??????? - post 4392 I'll add one of my own. What company do you work for and in what capacity? Now, you may think that this is off topic, but I do not. It's a question of credibility, doncha see, old pal? You have said that you would not trust anything that FNTN management tells you (I'm paraphrasing, but the sense is there). It is obvious that you certainly would not believe most of the posts provided by the members of this thread. So, is your entire evaluation of FNTN as an investment based on a comparison of news releases versus apparent results? Because if so, old sport, you are not telling us anything new. You seem to know a bit about comms issues, yet you also have no conception about the difficulty in implementing a completely secure, complex intranet with (presumably) state of the art capabilities. You're asking the wrong group of people about the technical aspects of this thing and as a result, you're getting second or third hand information. Call the company. At the risk of repeating myself, my own company's intranet took a good year to implement and get 'right'. It was designed by one of the largest IT consultants in the world (SAIC). You seem to have a serious problem with the number of shares that have been issued. Certainly that number has grown. It has been suggested that the stock has been and is being used as currency for acquisitions. Let's face it, what else have they got? This is not a large number in the penny stock universe. For my part, the authorized share number of 25MM gives me a great deal of comfort. I believe I'll be giving the transfer agent a call on a regular basis from this point on. If that number increases suddenly without notice to the shareholders, then I'll start to worry. Until then, I am content to wait semi-patiently for hard news. By the way, your misunderstanding of the float issue was definitely not impressive. I know I shouldn't drag that up and I'm certainly not going to address it again, but as before, credibility is at stake. One more question for you. Do you see anything at all positive about FNTN, present or future? You have to make your own choices, old buddy. I dislike purely negative posts as much as the rah-rah, cheerleader types. Try to get a balanced view of things, if that's possible. Mike P.S. This is my last post of the day. It's late.