Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhg_in_kc who wrote (60873)	8/25/1998 4:58:00 PM
From: Mohan Marette	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 176387

<--OT--> I never liked that dude any way, seems like a pervert to me. Looks like the only carnal pleasure the Starr dude is getting is from peeking into somebody else's personal life.I thought America stands for individualism and that the right to privacy is held in high esteem regardless of who the individual is, you know the right to bear arms and all that. Anyway I am not arguing the case for Clinton either I think he is an idiot for putting himself and the Presidency in such a precarious position, but this Starr dude is some'else.Ok that is 'nuff of that.

To: jhg_in_kc who wrote (60873)	8/25/1998 5:24:00 PM
From: mts362	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

I don't want to turn this into a Clinton/Starr thread, but... starr is only trying to do his job. he wouldn't have had to dig for details if the president was honest in the first place. Only after he denied having a relationship with monica did starr push for details. Our president is the one that should be deeply embarrassed after all the lies he has told the american people (not just about sex). Now the liberals (as always) are trying deflect blame for this on the "right wing conspiracy." Clinton lied for 7 months, and somehow Starr is at fault, get real. Matt Swanson

To: jhg_in_kc who wrote (60873)	8/25/1998 5:33:00 PM
From: Joe Sabatini	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 176387

OK, let's ignore the fact that this is a thread about 'Dell'. Ken Starr was appointed. He did not choose the crappy, thankless job he has now. If Clinton was not such a pandering, philandering, and prevaricating loser, none of this would be necessary. Yes, the economy is doing great, but I would certainly give 100 times more credit to Alan Greenspan than to Clinton. And I would give even more credit to the millions of people who have regular contributions going into their 401K's and SARSEP's and the like. In conclusion: Clinton lied to the face of the American people, plain and simple. I'm not saying he's significantly less honest or moral than past presidents...he's just not any better. Joe S.