SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joseph G. who wrote (31519)8/25/1998 5:44:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
Joe, Heck, if they don't have any workers, that eliminates a large cost factor that messes up their net income every quarter. -g-

Nope, still own puts on AMAT. Waiting for the loss this quarter and next to shock the true believers. However, unlike IBM, Intel and MU, these guys have been stingy about holding on to their cash. And, unlike IBM, Intel, and MU, Amat is a good co. and one I would own again about 2/3 lower in price.

MB



To: Joseph G. who wrote (31519)8/25/1998 7:20:00 PM
From: Merritt  Respond to of 132070
 
JG:

No wonder AMAT's in trouble (accepting voluntary redundancies, among other measures). I've always felt an inadvertant redundancy was preferrable to one that was voluntary, much less one that was involuntary.<G>

Merritt


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News