SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : ESVS - ENHANCED SERVICES CO INC -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe Copia who wrote (43)8/25/1998 10:48:00 PM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60
 
Look at it this way. Tom Burgess, with his two million shares, never attempted to enlist rank and file shareholder support in order to create a Zulu United Front opposition to the deal. He didn't do that, did he? Therefore, he must be pleased, if not the exchange itself, then by what he must know is coming down the pike. This is a good indicator.

Zulu, actually, is not a bad deal right now. And best yet, it can still can be a good buy down the road, depending on what happens to ESVS.

What's crucial is the ESVS share price keeps an increased course, because Zulu's share price contingently trails it, much in the same ratio we've seen lately.

But what I like best is Zulu's bubble has burst. Because of this there'll be less pressure and I think pricing tables will be set by Nasdaq trading tendencies rather than the good ole' OTC:BB system. Thus, Nasdaq sets the table for ESVS, with Zulu always the dinner guest.

It's my bet until both stocks trade under one name and one price, from time to time, Zulu will be the better buy; and from time to time ESVS will be the better buy. But these buying opportunities will only when market makers don't have their respective percentages in line with the ratio guideline.

Probably the best thing to note is Burgess wouldn't care to dine over the .08 meal you were proposing to feed him. I think he's already a guest at a table much in abundance.

Keep the meal hopeful and make sure everybody gets to eat. It's the best way to go.



To: Joe Copia who wrote (43)8/26/1998 12:38:00 AM
From: BlueFox  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60
 
We were discussing if ESVS diluted or not. Yes they did, but not for free as was suggested (ie, the stock was not given away, but paid for with ZULU stock). Since ZULU shareholders are trading in their stock for ESVS stock, there are now more shareholders, but a larger valued pie to divide, so individual shareholders in ESVS don't lose value in the transaction.

What remains to be seen now is how the market reacts to this in as it becomes wider knowledge.

BF



To: Joe Copia who wrote (43)8/27/1998 2:11:00 PM
From: aleta  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60
 
siliconinvestor.com