To: Jim S who wrote (7130 ) 8/26/1998 10:45:00 AM From: Jim S Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42834
Well, at least I livened things up around here. I'm a bit surprised at the lack of flames (only two real flamers), but I attribute that to the polite nature of most Brinker fans. Despite the discussion to the contrary, I maintain my position on my two main points -- 1) Brinker's "true believers" treat him and his advice more like a religion than a market advisor, and, 2) IMO Brinker has an obligation to his audience, that he (and many of you, obviously) will not acknowledge. Namely that if he is not going to do his show during times of market turmoil, he should, at a minimum, relay a message (via audio tape, or even just a verbal note to the guest host) that his model has / has not changed its indication and that his advice is unchanged / pending change. While I really like the idea of being able to drop the kids off at his house when I need a break, that may be just a little beyond what I should really expect from him. Besides, knowing Brinker, he'd probably go play golf just when the kids found the ice cream. To those of you who hang on his every word and try to interpret the subtile nuances of his words, I certainly respect your ability to listen and gain insight. I hope you can continue to do as well in the future as His Guidance has permitted in the past. As for me, I'll continue to listen to his program for advice that I think may be useful, and try to apply it it in conjunction with other advisors' comments that I respect. And, if his advice is missing at some critical juncture, I will continue to be irritated at his absence. Who knows? Maybe I'll even be irritated enough to crank up this little tempest in a teapot again. Best of luck to all, jim