Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (744)	8/26/1998 1:00:00 AM
From: pezz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Agreed but the 21 year old girl you speak of must also accept responsibility for her own actions.I don't believe that she was preyed upon any more than than I believe she planned the whole thing for the profit I believe she will ultimately receive.If her life is ruined it is of her own doing. himmmm 21 year old "girl" you make her sound sooo innocent. pez

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (744)	8/26/1998 1:26:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Respond to of 67261

>This BETTER BE about more than a consentual affair.< As I've been saying, people are so eager to forget that it WAS indeed about evading truth in a sexual harassment trial, which was in full legal force at the time. I have No Doubt that Clinton's strenuous insistence of pure innocence in each and every issue in that trial was a substantial force in the Judge denying Paula even a trial by a jury of her peers -- something that is not even denied to accused serial murdurers. Is Paula even more worthless than an accused murdurer, to have her complaint treated with such callous disregard?