Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Follies who wrote (16609)	8/26/1998 1:10:00 AM
From: Eashoa' M'sheekha	Respond to of 116791

Well Said. RE: Martin Armstrong " I guess I don't care where he got his education, I am interested in his current thinking. " Always good to read others THOUGHTS,like em or agree or not.He called the Loonie to hit ---or I don't know---two cents or something.It came back not long after his call.I thought he was a wacko=====doing the extreme thing.He was right,but not for all the reasons he implied.Close enough is good enough sometimes,eh?

To: Follies who wrote (16609)	8/26/1998 1:27:00 AM
From: Gary	Respond to of 116791

He started out as a physisist and wanted in the early 70's to put a big push on some area of computers at IBM or Kodak. They said no and he went on his own. Some of his calls have been good and like any other analyst you have to make choices. I have done much better after reading them all taking what I consider the best. I haven't found one source that gives all the right answers all the time but if you read the whole text of Armstrong a few times it makes more sense.Take his material and then read McAvity's stuff and so on and then a picture often begins to develope.McAvity also called the Can. $$ and I wish I had access to him as I'd like to hear what he has to say now on the Can. $$.PEI is not connected to the university