Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : WORLD WAR III -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: robnhood who wrote (17)	8/27/1998 8:14:00 AM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 765

rrman, with all due respect that is nothing but sophistry. Hitler was not a 'bad guy' because he lost. He was a homicidal maniac and the rest of the world needed to defend itself. I will agree that in many wars the bad guy is merely the guy who lost. But the original question clearly asked how thw we should respond to the likes of Hitler, a man who would have gleefully killed millions more if not stopped. How do we stop the Hitlers, Stalins and Pol Pots of the world. Henry

To: robnhood who wrote (17)	8/27/1998 3:34:00 PM
From: JJMM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 765

rrman, for you to imply that Sadam is perceived as a "bad guy" because he lost the gulf war is sick. Those Iraqi children are'nt starving because of the US. They're starving because Iraq needs a headline to play for pity in the Arab world and to provide a little fuel to US bashers like yourself. How many members of the Iraqi republican guard have even missed a meal while those children starve? My guess is none. I wonder how much you would preach if Canada (I see you're from Toronto) shared a border with Iraq. get real