Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Walt who wrote (1205)	8/27/1998 12:54:00 AM
From: Rocky510	Respond to of 2251

Walt, Hey! that's real clear now. Thanks (eom)

To: Walt who wrote (1205)	8/27/1998 1:38:00 AM
From: Tomato	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2251

Thanks Walt. Based on the NR, has your opinion of the possible or probable tonnage changed, or is it about the same? What would you guess at this point? Also, do you have any idea what % of the dyke is land based and what % is under water? There were a couple of analysts reports- Kaiser and Khanna, I think, that suggested that WSP would be drilling from islands in the north of Snap Lake (maybe to find "THE SOURCE"), but the NR doesn't mention any such drilling. Any opinion about the chances of a source being to the north of the dyke? TIA