Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gerald Walls who wrote (63467)	8/27/1998 3:31:00 AM
From: Gary Ng	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Gerald, Please re-read the whole thing again "A Celeron-A (with 128k on-die full-speed cache) is supposed to perform at roughly the same speed as a P-II at the same clock speed (300 vs. 300, etc). A C-300-A overclocked to run at 450 runs at roughly the same speed as a non-overclocked P-II-450 at a fraction of the price." Yes I know that. But a Celeron 266 can also be overclocked to perform like a PII 300 or K6-2 300. Why didn't Celeron sell like hot cakes ? >What is CelA-333 ? If you mean Celeron 333, can you show >me the benchmark ? >http://www.tomshardware.com/releases/98q3/980824/index.html Seems that Celeron 333 if running as it is supposed to be, is slower than PII 350. Gary