SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Koligman who wrote (63490)8/27/1998 2:07:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 186894
 
INTC: BEAR STEARNS made new estimate for quarter ending 09/98
of $0.72 on 07/31/98



To: John Koligman who wrote (63490)8/27/1998 9:38:00 PM
From: Paul Fiondella  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Kurlak---"Intel needs to get into new markets" Gates---Don't you build a JAVA MPU

Groves caves in and the rest is history. Intel the monopoly wanna be. Intel the company without moral fibre. Grove cringing before herr Gates in his own private Intel conference room. Intel caving in to Microsoft. Intel paying the price. Ah and there's the rub.

Its hard to feel sorry for such a pathetic company. They couldn't even stand up to Gates when they absolutely dominated the microprocessor industry. Some would say it was cowardice but judging from that stellar engineer Paul Engel and his posts here, I would say it was a failure of imagination. They really thought Wintel was good for Intel when in fact it was good for MSFT.

============

Leading economic indicator---AMAT layoffs.

What a bunch of winners.




To: John Koligman who wrote (63490)8/27/1998 11:30:00 PM
From: Tom Cannon  Respond to of 186894
 
The problem with these bears is that they can't stand to see Intel
succeed year after year after year. Their logic for Intel's downfall
is full of holes. Comparing Intel to Xerox and DEC is silly. And the
suggestion that the PC market is drying up has been said for the past
10 years. Oh yes, and the assumption that Intel's management is
clueless about the future of processors and pricing strategies is
a real laugh.