Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : THNS - Technest Holdings (Prev. FNTN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin McKenzie who wrote (4648)	8/27/1998 4:30:00 PM
From: Kevin McKenzie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 15313

I'm reposting this because I messed up a link. I'm not trying to inundate the thread with the same message. Apology for off subject post. This post isn't about FNTN, it's about Cliff. First let me say, I've never predicted a price for FNTN, I've never made as statement such as "this one's going to the moon" or "this is the next Yahoo" (in fact I dispute any comparison of FNTN to Yahoo, Amazon.com, AOL, etc). I've never, as far as I know, hyped the stock. Yes I do call the company as part of my Due Diligence. Cliff can't call the company, for fear of caller id. I don't take a company's sales projections as gospel, but I believe it is one's duty to ask the company such questions as "Why did you choose that particular hardware vendor?", "Why are you using something proprietary, rather than open standard technology?" etc. Rather than assuming that because you know something about one aspect of a technology, you are the expert in all technical decisions made by a company that you haven't even bothered to call. Here's a little insight into Cliff's modus operandi and, I believe, motivations: Cliff has made no secret (on the FNTN thread, that is) of his negative views regarding Nevada penny stocks www3.techstocks.com and yet three days prior to his revealed expertise about and distrust for Nevada penny stocks, he's buying thousands www3.techstocks.com and more thousands www3.techstocks.com of shares of a penny stock incorporated in Nevada sos.state.nv.us Not only is this a Nevada penny stock, but it is at least the second manifestation of the same company. The first of which "is not in good standing" even with Nevada's loose rules of incorporation. Notice the president, Andrew Cimerman, is the same on both Corporations. I'm sure that's not something that escaped Cliff's keen and suspicious eye. sos.state.nv.us He also doesn't seem to apply quite the same rigorous standards to HMLF that he is applying to FNTN. HMLF has never released revenue figures, they have just within the past couple days retained attorneys to file their forms with the SEC (a process that takes 60 days from filing of the application). Yet Cliff has supposedly purchased this stock. Why does he apply such strict standards to FNTN and such loose standards to HMLF? Now I don't think for one minute that Cliff actually owns any HMLF. It is his pattern to pretend to be long, then bash the shares when he thinks the timing is ideal. Cliff, you don't hide your trail very well. Kevin PS I agree with Cliff that inserting a link back to one of his posts seems an ineffective way to thwart his bashing. I would suggest putting a link to this post, so people can begin to understand Cliff for what he is.

To: Kevin McKenzie who wrote (4648)	8/27/1998 4:31:00 PM
From: don roberson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15313

Kevin. Due to the lack of responses to his posts, I think most now see. Just "click on by".

To: Kevin McKenzie who wrote (4648)	8/27/1998 4:33:00 PM
From: dharampal luthra	Respond to of 15313

Good newsletter material Kevin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Thanks Harry

To: Kevin McKenzie who wrote (4648)	8/27/1998 4:37:00 PM
From: Radim Parchansky	Respond to of 15313

Those "Investors" make a lot of money and know how to manipulate stock with fear. What's good about all this? For one shares moved to more consistent longs, we found the bottom (about 1, bounds off twice), we have an example of this stock manipulation and it happened at 1-1.5 level before news and not 2-8 level after news (as in the case of PNLK - well this was somewhat correct IMO). Posters like that are like a virus and healthy stock should become immune to it. Another thing - I checked SI posts of other negative posters (will not mention names) and guess what? There are negative elsewhere as well. Radim