SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave who wrote (14211)8/27/1998 6:26:00 PM
From: Clarksterh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Dave - We are in complete, if general, agreement although as with many patent issues it often turns on definitions.

Clark

PS No need to send me the case law. I've seen it, although I have a lousy memory for details (as opposed to general landscapes) and couldn't remember any specifics - even where I'd seen it. In case it isn't obvious, I do work, of a sort (a hobby really), in this area (philosophy of IP law).



To: Dave who wrote (14211)8/28/1998 2:35:00 AM
From: Asterisk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
It would appear that you are fairly knowlegeable in the Legal arts. That being the case I am sure that it wouldn't be all that hard for you to do a boolean patent search and look up the exact patents in question (QCOM and CDMA). I have in the past skimmed them and I saw no language that would limit them to IS-95. I however have very, very, little if any skill in legal stuff.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News