SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pezz who wrote (913)8/27/1998 11:32:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
pezz,
Heres what they think on the Dell thread about this Clinton stuff. I am just copying the post vs. posting a link because I dont think this guy wants to get any replies from the political threads. Lots of political posts over there, but this one was by far the most popular.

Warning - Rated PG

OT--Starr is doing his job alright. His job is to nullify the results of two elections by embarrasing and neutering the president. He is a voyueristic, tit-tweaking, towel flicker who probably lusts after little Sunday school girls in white cotton panties. He set a perjury trap for the president, creating a crime where none existed. I hope he is confined in a bedroom in hell and forced to have perpetual strenuous intimacies with Linda Tripp.
jhg



To: pezz who wrote (913)8/28/1998 5:11:00 AM
From: RJC2006  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
>>>Either way I don't believe that the government should have the right to demand that citizens [even presidents] answer questions about their most private activities certainly not under these circumstances.<<<

Yeah, most women feel the way you do....until they arrive at the divorce court.



To: pezz who wrote (913)8/28/1998 8:03:00 AM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
"Perjury trap." I like that one. A clever new clause that shifts blame to the legal system instead of the liar.



To: pezz who wrote (913)8/28/1998 9:20:00 AM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
<<I don't believe that the government should have the right to demand that citizens [even presidents] answer questions about their most private activities>>

Pezz, I assume then that you objected to Clarence Thomas's questioning about his personal life, his sex life with his wife, and his relationship with his female subordinates.