Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paunch who wrote (33792)	8/27/1998 11:19:00 PM
From: Wild Rose	Respond to of 35569

I have a hard time believing that IPM would just walk away from that property without taking advantage of any and all opportunities. Everyone who is anyone has said that IPM really has the goods in the ground, so my question is, WHAT REALLY, REALLY HAPPENED??? I hope that the rumor Jackson is sharing is true and that something good comes from it. All we can do is wait and see on that issue. Maybe through our grapevine we'll get a word or two !!!

To: Paunch who wrote (33792)	8/27/1998 11:35:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Paunch, I have tried to accurately assess and describe IPM at all times. At times things did look a bit better, but the information turned out to be false hype and there was nothing there. I finally concluded it was a tech scam put on non tech people. Notice the techs like thall, Charters , me etc did not stay fooled but figured it out early. Some like thall knew way up front and so he was attacked and calumnified. I expect if they get the SEC to examine this in great detail they will find a bunch of fakers in there. They will not be traceable as a fake name can be backed by another fake name and so there will be nothing for SI to reveal. Bill