To: go4it who wrote (33796 ) 8/28/1998 6:40:00 AM From: d:oug Respond to of 35569
Chuck, I am now optimistic that the "soon" civil law suit and the shareholders joining together pledging share votes, will make any dark force or bad people or conspiracy to back off and cease the attempts to make IPM fail. I believe that without the shareholders taking the actions so far, that IPM management would have simply let the events conclude to what seemed a sure thing. Eventho some have speculated that some employees or directors of IPM may have been on the side of those wanting IPM to fail, I will suggest a guess that if so, that they were not the ones to initiate the plan or desire to make IPM fail, but were caught up into something that causes good people to make bad and wrong decisions. IPM shareholders were not served as they should have been by IPM employees and officers, nomatter what the reasons were. But again I speak for myself only, in that if a PP does happen, and current sharholders get to keep a fraction of current share numbers, then to me its better than the zero, and eventho I may only keep 1 share for every 10,15,? I presently hold, atleast I have shares in IPM and can go back to the days of watching and hoping for testing and extraction news that will increase share value. And yes Chuck, that reference to buying ipmcf shares is a little like that Alice In Wonderland story. Today buy 10 ipmcf shares, and tomorrow a PP will take 9 from you, leaving you with 1. Pay for 10, get 1. Or wrost case, pay for 100, get 1. Today hold 100, tomorrow got 1. But at least IPM continues to be traded, and has a second chance to test and extract precious metals. Jay Taylor should be back from vacation now. Unless what I heard about Tim giving Jay a ride in a black hellocopper with no seatbelts, over some rain forest, is true. Doug