Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (7119)	8/28/1998 1:53:00 PM
From: francis terry	Respond to of 14226

Gee I never thought it was possible to see 4 posts on this thread that looked like the people responding were really serious on their posts. You all are to be commended for your posts, too bad we could not confine this thread to very smart thinking and not just a bunch of hooie. Again thanks for the posts --francis terry--

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (7119)	8/28/1998 2:09:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Ed: the last sentence in your last post caught my eye: "This happened just after McKay1s dynamite post which created a lot of buying.", are you inferring that Mike is in "cohoot" with the sellers (short or otherwise) and every so often comes here to post very encouraging information so that the "evil forces" could use the demand created to sell their shares? I think that is what you implied, but I would rather you tell me "No Way". I remember "Rothchilds" and the "Hoare" using similar strategy with IMPCF at the time, and Capital even went so far, at a critical junction in IPMCF history, to announce that they bought some 50,000 shares when they had no obligation to do so, nor have they ever announced their buy the next day before. Sound like a "Vinik" to me. I must be paranoid, right? <VBG> Zeev