Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mrknowitall who wrote (61977)	8/28/1998 3:48:00 PM
From: freeus	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 176387

I agree that anything new to any of us is news to that person. Information, even two month old information is not wrong. I guess LOD reacted because of the timing (such a panicky market.) Freeus

To: mrknowitall who wrote (61977)	8/28/1998 4:45:00 PM
From: Kayaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

your reaction to NewsTraders only ads fuel to the fires of ignorance. Threatening the messenger instead of rationally addressing the issue does not contribute much. Newstrader is spamming dozens of threads with the same type of information with the sole purpose of promoting his web site. JMHO.

To: mrknowitall who wrote (61977)	8/28/1998 6:57:00 PM
From: divvie	Respond to of 176387

>>but my point was, and is, that your reaction to NewsTraders only ads fuel to the fires of ignorance<< Actually that was (sort of) your secondary point. You started your post with an insult (LONGonDELL = short on insight . . .) and proceeded to explain what LOD had already posted earlier, i.e. that these insider sales were normal and should not be taken out of context. LOD's point to you was that if you had read any of his posts about said subject, you would have realized that he agrees with you and you were directing your explanation at the wrong person. Your second point about the spammer being a good source of info was valid that's all you said. Hence LOD was actually responding to your misdirected first point. If you read the thread of your posts, all will become clear. BTW no insults or offence intended, just trying to clear up a misunderstanding that I think was missed in the posts.