Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (1037)	8/28/1998 4:21:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

No, because some feel that "N word" question was pertinent to the OJ case. A perjury trap against Mark Fuhrman would have been more like tying the use of marijuana with the DNA evidence botch, asking Mark Fuhrman if he had ever tried marijuana in his life, then based on his desire to deflect the OJ defense from that line of thinking (or just to protect his job at the PD) he says no, he has never tried marijuana. The defense then calls Fuhrmans high school girlfriend to testify that Fuhrman did in fact try marijuana once, Fuhrman gets fired from the LAPD for lying on his job application, and the public becomes enamoured with this Fuhrman fiasco and the OJ prosecution is damaged severely because of it.