SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Cistron Biotechnology(CIST)$.30 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Harmon who wrote (1381)8/28/1998 5:48:00 PM
From: scaram(o)uche  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2742
 
If I gave you Connaught, covering all indications and expression modes, for $0 up-front, $0 development costs, and 15% royalties, would you be ga-ga over the deal?

Again, when I talked with Naismith, I was left with the impression that he didn't know about the Levy work. That work is now two years old and very stale. To be handing out kudos here is pure garbage. These guys didn't get the job done. If they can rally and save a bit of our collective asses, great.

BTW.... I gave up on trying to arrange a deal a few weeks ago, and I wrote the company, Jenner BioTherapeutics, that I had talked to about CIST (without disclosing the company name). I gave them Brucie's name and phone number. This would not be a partner... it's the only sane concept that should be put on the table.... Jenner would be merged into CIST. CIST would be the surviving company, managed by Jenner personnel. Galton could go twiddle thumbs somewhere else.

You find a company with antigens but no money. You merge it with a company that has money and an adjuvant, but no antigen. On the side, you look to collaborate with someone that can "stealth" and target toxic molecules. Is that concept so damned difficult to grasp? Everyone, including insiders holding options, comes out smiling. The shareholders end up with a company that has a market cap of $40 million. Was this possible 1/97? Yes. Is this concept viable now? Probably not.

The thought that Galton could manage a research company and adjuvant-related studies is, IMO, hilarious. Either an IL-1beta sequence works as a genetic adjuvant, or the company has to wait for another indication to come along. Wound healing and IL-1? Yeah, that's a fresh concept.

IMO, Galton almost killed this company through a lack of aggressive action and through relative ignorance of his opportunities. In the correct hands (I've been posting leads for ages in this thread), the adjuvant studies could have brought in *BIG* funding.

Give accolades all you want. It's pure bull. These guys didn't get the job done in a timely fashion, and, as a result, the potential value of the patents has been cut to a fraction of what it could have been.

21 months for this.