Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (33808)	8/29/1998 4:52:00 AM
From: Tim Hall	Respond to of 35569

Richard, It used to be that no one knew how to assay the dirt, now they don't know where to take samples. Maybe it is the desert Leprecauns just keep moving the gold around. If we could just catch one of those Leprecauns they would have to give up their gold. VBG Tim

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (33808)	8/29/1998 10:54:00 AM
From: Bill Jackson	Respond to of 35569

Richard, Do you believe that sucker talk? If so you are a sucker. If you do a nickel sulfur fusion assay with a AA finish you will get all the elements that you are interested in finding measured with accuracy. Now NiS is costly($100) and FA is cheap ($7-9) and that is why it is preferred. true some minerals are hard with FA, but none are hard with NiS. Obscuring minerals?, all accounted for in the preparation procedure. If you want to get a working assay that is cheap you will have to do an unusual preparation, this is true, as grade control etc cannot justify NiS assays at $100 each(they are costly even if done in house) Bill