SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bmart who wrote (2513)8/29/1998 11:17:00 AM
From: Arcane Lore  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26163
 
Mr. Lore,
I suggest you inquire about procuring the information from the I.R. dept of AZNT, I am a shareholder,I procured my information through diligence .


bmart:

Thank you for your response. As you know, there are many ways of performing diligence. I respectively suggest that independent assessment and confirmation of a stock's merits and risks is usually best, particularly where BB stocks are concerned. Nonetheless, I recognize there are those who believe, in Tideglider's words, that DD means Dial De company. Even in the latter camp, there will be those who hold the company to a higher standard and seek independent confirmation of claims. For example, if told over the phone or via a web page that a key company individual was associated in some fashion with a scientific publication, they will ask for a copy of that publication or at least the key page describing the individual's contributions to the publication. Or to take another example, if the company says that a scientist from a given organization is an advisor to the company, one will, at a minimum, attempt to independently verify that both the scientist and the organization exist and that the scientist is affiliated with the organization in question. Better than that, of course, is to contact the individual in question and have him/her confirm or deny the company's claims

Turning now to the particular article in question, as an AZNT stockholder you undoubtedly will be happy to learn that I have no need to obtain assistance from AZNT, thereby leaving AZNT IR resources free to assist others. I suspect, perhaps incorrectly, that I already have more information about the article than you possess.

Since you appear to be asserting that there is a favorable reference to Dr. L in the article, I think it a fair question whether your knowledge is based on perusal of the actual article (or some portion of it) or assertions from the company (over the phone or from its web site) without independent documentation?