Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d:oug who wrote (33809)	8/29/1998 5:01:00 AM
From: Tim Hall	Respond to of 35569

Doug, Have you been taking correspondence lessons from Chuca? Consider this. Someone stakes claims and convinces someone else that the desert is full of gold and platinum. A company is started to recover the goodies. The stock is promoted and goes up. The company wishes to buy the claims from the first party, only now the claims are owned by a company based in the Cayman Islands. The company commits many shares to the claim owner as collateral. Several months later, the company announces bad news and the stock tanks. Questions. 1. Did the claim owners sell the collateral shares before the stock tanked? 2. Did the claim owners short the stock when it was real high and use collateral shares to cover? For the answers to these questions, you will have to find out who are the owners of Omega Corporation. Good Luck, Tim

To: d:oug who wrote (33809)	8/29/1998 10:40:00 AM
From: Joe Hartenbower	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Doug... >>Bill, at age 8 in third grade, did you miss this grade and never make it up. This was the year to learn how to give answers to questions.<< Doug, you are only half right. I think the other side gets into why Jackson has spent so much time on this thread insulting investors, spreading rumors and making unfounded claims. He certainly doesn't have the success credentials that would justify what would otherwise be thought of as flat lies or manipulation. Why does he post what he does when he isn't even an investor in IPM. He has cried "SCAM" so many times that he may have worked for the manipulators. He claims he is a an American settled and living in Canada... why? His pattern is attack, insult and when somebody stands up and won't take it, attack him. If somebody is trying to scam the present investors, what Jackson says is sure helping them. I'm really tired of his insults and BS.

To: d:oug who wrote (33809)	8/29/1998 10:44:00 AM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Doug, the IPM scam was carefully prepared and looked valid at first and to many still looks valid. There was no "scam" sign on it, just warnings. At some point you will find out who is/was behind the scam. I suspect there were a few people drawn in who are innocent. Perhaps the crooks do not show at all and all the people visible are honest? people who got paid for their names and work etc. The ultimate 'flag' of a scam is the falsehood of the basic premise of the scam. In this case gold/plat in black rock. Had this been a straight exploration effort where money is gathered for a job of work in exploration(like Charles group) then the risks would be known and that is it. this was sold as a box with $100 billion in it with huge profits as we take the box and open it up. sadly as you opened the box you discerned within it another box, and again and again as you tried to penetrate to the ultimate box another box would impede you. This whole thing depended on no-one ever assaying the dirt. Alomost two years ago i suggested that a secret dirt assay be done at night. Within 2 days the trench was filled in. At that point it was clear that it was a scam and the management was in on it, they read and posted to SI. So you go and name some names if you like, you know them better than i do. It was obviously a con to get you to buy the scam that there was $$ in black rock dirt. If the gold/plat was there why did they need you guys at all? Stay private and get rich. No they needed a sucker pool to transfer money from. With knowledge of the release of data they could milk long/short positions. They could even take down the reg s shares offshore themselves, short on shore and cover when the time had passed and the stock had dropped. Bill