Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (5528)	8/29/1998 12:55:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	Respond to of 11603

Richard, Richard, You are now defending CL Shilltmore? Its one thing to believe what you say but acknowledge the possibility you may be wrong. Its called an opinion. I think you hold pretty strong opinions about Maxam. It is quite another to announce over and over again in no uncertain terms that "X is going to happen" "Y is going to happen" "Christmas at the AGM", yada yada yada. All the while acting as a sort of "semi-official company spokesman." And then berate and ridicule those who choose to be skeptical of your mantra. I can't imagine anybody defending that clown.

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (5528)	8/29/1998 12:56:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	Respond to of 11603

Richard, Richard, You are now defending CL Shilltmore? Its one thing to believe what you say but acknowledge the possibility you may be wrong. Its called an opinion. I think you hold pretty strong opinions about Maxam. It is quite another to announce over and over again in no uncertain terms that "X is going to happen" "Y is going to happen" "Christmas at the AGM", yada yada yada. All the while acting as a sort of "semi-official company spokesman." And then berate and ridicule those who choose to be skeptical of your mantra. I can't imagine anybody defending that clown.

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (5528)	8/29/1998 12:56:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11603

Richard, Richard, You are now defending CL Shilltmore? Its one thing to believe what you say but acknowledge the possibility you may be wrong. Its called an opinion. I think you hold pretty strong opinions about Maxam. It is quite another to announce over and over again in no uncertain terms that "X is going to happen" "Y is going to happen" "Christmas at the AGM", yada yada yada. All the while acting as a sort of "semi-official company spokesman." And then berate and ridicule those who choose to be skeptical of your mantra. I can't imagine anybody defending that clown.

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (5528)	8/29/1998 5:08:00 PM
From: Laser	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11603

Mr. Mazzarella, Richard if I may, no apology needed. Shorts do not expect to be treated with kid gloves ;). You have raised some valid concerns and I would like to respond. >>>You as a short especially know that you benefit from activist shareholders,<<< Agreed. The DD's are a fave of mine, a cash cow if you will. The spin that these gentlemen can generate is something else. I would use a different term to describe them, but I am trying to be nice ;). >>>.... hide behind a frustrated investor to achieve your objectives,...<< Not in this case. Anytime, I see CL's comments used, I just get a little defensive. Disgruntled shareholders do work to a shorters advantage I admit (I submit the NAXOF thread as an example), but I wouldn't advocate silence because of this. >>>Maybe you were posting as a trial animal?<<< Not part of the menagerie ;).