SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (1110)8/29/1998 11:23:00 AM
From: pezz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
I do deplore the questions asked Thomas that you speak of .There would be no difference than questioning a rape victim about her passed sex life.I a;so understand the pattern of behavior question but considering that there was not the slightest bit of evidence that Monica was in any way pressured. [If being pressured wasn't the real question here it should have been]I don't believe these questions were justified. Given what was ultimately brought about Bill and Monica how does this in any way demonstrate that Clinton tried in any way to intimidate Paula Jones?Because in one incident bill Clinton had an affair with a subordinate [Monica] among many affairs [apparently] with non subordinates only demonstrates the he has a pattern of being an adulterer .
pez



To: Bill who wrote (1110)8/29/1998 1:15:00 PM
From: art slott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
>Monica, a subordinate, was given job preference for sexual favors.<

Wrong hpypothesis. She was recommended by the White House for an entry level position that she was capable of performing. Happens all the time. Thats why you intern at the White House.
Not a quid pro quo for sex. They did want her away from the President.

Art