SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (1146)8/29/1998 2:44:00 PM
From: art slott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
I believe the matter is handled solely by Congress.



To: Bill who wrote (1146)8/29/1998 2:46:00 PM
From: art slott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
The grand jury if there was one, there won't be, would not indict imo.



To: Bill who wrote (1146)8/29/1998 7:12:00 PM
From: john  Respond to of 67261
 
<Are you arguing against indictment or conviction? >

I think what he is trying to say is that no prosecutor would indict if he felt he would not get a conviction.

Unless of coarse he is a Republican prsecutor.



To: Bill who wrote (1146)8/29/1998 9:57:00 PM
From: RJC2006  Respond to of 67261
 
<<<No it won't. But even if the tapes are inadmissable (an improbable scenario) he is still indicted. Are you arguing against indictment or conviction? Those are two different actions.>>>

Hell, according to Clinton cronies what's on the tapes are his best defense. Yeah, I say throw those damn things out!