Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : lcav -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Harry W. Lowe who wrote (528)	9/2/1998 3:59:00 PM
From: Harry W. Lowe	Respond to of 942

To All, The short term activity in LCAV for the last few days and today has been impressive, but the intermediate and long term trends are still down. Both short term stochastic and momentum indicators are forming a double bottom or 'W' pattern. It is possible on a near term basis to see the stock price move up to $2.00, but this possible rise in price will be short lived. I am still looking for a retest of $1.0625 and possibly $0.875 before this stock goes into a basing period (accumulation). This issue has a lot of loyal followers all willing to buy at what they believe to be the bottom of the price decrease. However, now is not the time for entry in LCAV. Harry

To: Harry W. Lowe who wrote (528)	9/2/1998 5:45:00 PM
From: Manny Gugliuzza	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 942

thanks Harry, i had to reread the letter from Dr. Joffe trying to get an understanding of what he feels is the best interest of the stockholders. after loosing 36 million on paper and the potential for 30-50% more after split the cash flow of the company seems small. I do not think we can really be sure that the stock price now will discount any further affect of the split at least not from what i have been through several times before. announced reversal splits may cause immediate sell offs as we have seen, sometimes basing and implementation by the company may cause the attraction of short sellers and a subsequent 30-50% decline usually does occur at current levels this would with a 1:10 would possibly bring us to 7-10$ pershare from which a strong powerful rise would ensue IF earnings stay on tract. The only understanding to be drawn from this action that the company continues to pursue during a severe market struggle is that 1. they have no market timing and are ignorant of market influences that can crush a companies ability to raise cash, also 2. that they will most likely declare the split at the wrong time and 3.that this is for the long haul into the new millennium with reduced # of shares and positive earnings which have now seen their 1st push back to 1 Q 99 from 3rd Q 98. it will be difficult to convince the average investor that the boards actions are in their best interest and drawing new money investors nearly impossible with all actions ongoing. OBV,the only somewhat positive indicator is remaining high only from the Joffe's and summits holding shares. essentially in the long haul i believe this should be in the best interests for the COMPANY i just wish they would come out and say it like it really is. ar.