Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : THNS - Technest Holdings (Prev. FNTN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cliff Daniel who wrote (4801)	8/30/1998 10:37:00 AM
From: Speedster	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15313

Cliff--you're ignoring attempts to engage you in discussion. I am not a cheerleader, but so far I like the concept of the company. Cliff, I hate to tell you this, but we are all aware of insider trading & how to keep up with them. You ignore attempts to engage in discussion about the product and service that is going to be offered by FNTN, and seem preoccupied with 144s and the open standards. (you're posts are becoming boring mantras) You never say why it will be open standard for the intranet (I know why the internet, but why do you need open standard for an intranet). Are you going to ignore attempt as intelligent discussion about business plans, markets and ideas as you seem fixated on this notion that this is a scam and intend to discuss only those issue which support your leaky hypothesis? Once again--why do intranet standards need to be uniform? If FNTN builds an intranet server and provides the necessary software on the peripherial, why does it have to follow a standard. It accomplishes its purpose. Since its is an intranet, why would you want to integrate internet features on it. Maybe this will be a test. I trying to engage you, but you will probably ignore as you might have to bite your lip and say something positive about FNTN. Didn't you say it was your goal to counteract the cheerleading squad--so that you may be unwilling to objectively discuss FNTN?