Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paunch who wrote (33825)	8/30/1998 9:29:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 35569

Paunch, was there any basis to Jackson's post that people were conducting assays at BRX? What kind of an organization lets him know more about what's going on than longs. That's something that frost my ass about these threads. Guys that profess that they don't have any financial interest seem to have more knowledge about what's happening than shareholders. These threads are proving to be useless for information useful to shareholders and only serves people with their own agendas, it stinks.

To: Paunch who wrote (33825)	8/30/1998 9:54:00 AM
From: Tim Hall	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Paunch, <<I understand the law suit against Coggons and the others is getting close to beginning, and maybe the truth will then come out. >> Which others are named in the suit? Perhaps you should suggest that your free class action attorney hire an investigator and find out who, if anyone will be paying the claim maintenance fees on Black Rock tomorrow. I have been told but have not confirmed that the placer claims are in Omega's name. The hard rock claims are probably in IPM's name. I don't think the hard rock claims will be renewed. Tim