SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (36510)8/30/1998 11:17:00 AM
From: Maxwell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583680
 
Scrumbia:

<<RISC CPU's generally do double precision faster than single precision.>>

Can you explain why this is so? Is it because the RISC CPU has a 64bit registers and 64-bit fp core?

<<If you look closely at the image quality of 3D apps on your computer, you will see that real-time 3D rendering for computers is not at a very advanced stage. In fact it is in it's infancy. >>

Don't you think the reason 3D games are still at its infancy because the software writers know that the current desktop doesn't have the FP power to do high resolution and reasonable frame rate? Don't you think that if the FP power increase by 5X due to faster CPU power and larger memory bandwidth I still can achieve higher 3D resolution at acceptable frame rate? I can use smoothing function to compensate to make picture stunning. Even at 64-bit double precision you are not even close to "photographic image".

The problem with the double precision is that it is a 64 bits calculation and the CPU is a 32bits and is not optimized for 64bits.
Thus double-precision FP will never be as fast as the 32-bit single precision calculation.

Anyway, check out this site for the next cool game, Trespasser

trespasser.com

This game is the next generation in gaming experience. This game is optimized for 3DNow! Due to its extensive use of FP there are 3DNow "handcode" written lines to make the game fps faster. This game will show you the difference between SIMD "single-precision FPU" versus Intel pipeline FPU.

Maxwell



To: Scumbria who wrote (36510)8/30/1998 11:50:00 AM
From: Yousef  Respond to of 1583680
 
Scumbria,

Re: "Maxwell, Perhaps we can keep the discussion at a more mature level than this."

Trust me, Scumbria ... Maxwell won't be able to do this, IMHO.

Make It So,
Yousef



To: Scumbria who wrote (36510)8/30/1998 11:55:00 AM
From: dumbmoney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583680
 
Supporting SIMD double precision would be idiotic, since 3-D apps don't use double precision and it would slow things down massively (not to mention the chip area)

The only reason why this argument continues is that some people believe that KNI is double precision. Just shows how partisan some people are.