SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Greg Jung who wrote (25706)8/30/1998 1:22:00 PM
From: set  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
> He said he was referring to ''obligations to destroy
> natural monopolies, shift the full tax burden to
> individual citizens (from companies) and to raise
> housing rent by 15 percent every year.''

do I understand correctly that these are IMF conditions for the
loan? It may be obvious from the context, but I want to be
sure before I reach the awful conclusion it suggests.

Shahar



To: Greg Jung who wrote (25706)8/30/1998 6:54:00 PM
From: Philipp  Respond to of 94695
 
Hi Greg:

Do you suppose they will give back the loan before asking for different conditions?

Russia is a financial black hole. Never expect any money back. The 25 - 30 % they offered last week was a pretty generous offer, though I don't think it stands any longer. In fact, it is quite clear that the German government/banks never expected to get any of the loan money back when they gave the loans (this is all still part of the price the West German government agreed to pay for bankrupt East Germany, negotiated with Gorbachev). A friend told me yesterday that last year Dresdner Bank wrote off 90 % of a loan for Poland the day after it was issued!

Cheers,

Phil