SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pat Hughes who wrote (53239)8/31/1998 2:04:00 AM
From: djane  Respond to of 61433
 
Morning as well to you, Pat. Here's a nice Monday IBD article on Frontier with ASND references

Will Frontier Be
Trailblazer For Speedy
Fiber Networks?

Date: 8/31/98
Author: Michele Hostetler

The Web's unflattering nickname, ''World
Wide Wait,'' will be a thing of the past if
long-distance provider Frontier Corp. has its
way.

Officials at Rochester, N.Y.-based Frontier
are hawking a high-speed network they
claim can handle 286 times the current
network traffic of AT&T Corp., Sprint
Corp., MCI Communications Corp. and
WorldCom Inc. combined.

''People talk about how there's going to be
an oversupply of bandwidth,'' said Doug
Hickey, president of Frontier GlobalCenter
in Sunnyvale, Calif., the data and Internet
arm of Frontier Corp. ''I contend there's
going to be an undersupply of the right
bandwidth. People are just going to need
more and more.''

Frontier, the nation's sixth-largest
long-distance provider, is tapping the latest
in networking gear from industry leaders
Cisco Systems Inc. and Ascend
Communications Inc. to provide the
underpinnings of fiber-optic networks.

It will be one of the most advanced
networks,
says Larry Lang, senior vice
president of marketing for Cisco's service
provider line of business.

''I think they're certainly leading the pack,''
Lang said. Frontier's fiber-optic network is
expected to be 85% operational by year's
end, spanning 13,000 miles and serving 120
metropolitan areas in the U.S. Frontier is
working with Qwest Communications
International to build the network.

Frontier isn't the only company building a
massive fiber-optic network this year.
Williams Networks, a division of Tulsa,
Okla.-based Williams Cos., is spending
$2.7 billion on its new national network. The
company began testing this summer on a
segment of its network that stretches
between Washington, D.C., and Atlanta.

Although the total price tag hasn't been
completely tallied, Frontier's network is
expected to cost roughly $2 billion, Hickey
said.


''We can deliver to a customer 'liquid'
bandwidth,'' he said. ''When you need it, you
can have it.''

The cost for fiber-optic cables alone on the
project is $500 million, says Jonathan
Heiliger, Frontier's chief technology officer.
Frontier is buying $20 million worth of
Cisco's high-speed switch routers and $14
million worth of Ascend's switches. Routers
direct traffic on networks while switches add
an extra lane to networks to move data
faster.


Hickey says the hefty bill is worth it because
Frontier can offer its customers more
services at a faster pace. Frontier's
customers include Excite Inc., Yahoo Inc.
and Quote.com .

The network will be more valuable, say,
when the stock market dips and investors
want to check their stocks. Investors often
inundate Quote.com's Web site.

Quote.com can monitor the increasing hits
and order more bandwidth to handle the
load. Bandwidth is critical because it's tied
to other services, such as access to database
software, Heiliger says.

Web sites use database software to house
information about their customers for
personalized Web pages such as My Excite.
The databases are under intense pressure as
more surfers use the site.

Heiliger says Web page operators all want
database replication so that when one
database goes down, another one can pick
up the work. Software on Frontier's
network will be able to ship the same query
to two databases simultaneously so users
never receive a blank Web page.

Frontier's new network will be able to
pinpoint where a Web user is located to
speed up response time, Heiliger says. That
way, if someone in New York is at the
Quote.com site, his request won't be sent to
the database server in California.

The network also will tackle problems with
latency, or the time taken to complete a
task, Heiliger says. For example, it takes an
average of 80 milliseconds to ship data coast
to coast, he says.

But latency time fluctuates during the day. It
could be 60 milliseconds at 10 a.m. and
slow down to 120 milliseconds at 5 p.m.
Information can speed to its destination or sit
in a traffic jam.

Also, latency time wreaks havoc with
databases because questions usually are
submitted in a predictable stream, Heiliger
says. Frontier plans to flatten out latency
time so traffic flows at a predictable rate.

Frontier isn't using the older fiber-optic
technology called synchronous optical
network, Hickey says. SONET isn't very
flexible, and flexibility is key, he says.


''Nobody is smart enough in this business to
understand what our customers will need 24
to 36 months out,'' Hickey said.

The network uses dense wavelength division
multiplexing, or DWDM, which acts like a
prism on a fiber-optic cable to create more
wavelengths. Voice, video and data ride on
wavelengths of light in the cables.

DWDM costs about one-third less than
SONET equipment, Heiliger says. It's also
flexible, so Frontier can easily change
bandwidth allocations.

Internet Protocol will be layered on top of
the optical network. IP is the language used
on the Internet to transmit data, similar to
Ethernet on local-area networks. Other
speedy technologies, such as asynchronous
transfer mode and Frame Relay, also will be
used on the optical network to ship data.

Heiliger says Frontier needed networking
gear makers that were up to speed and
working with the technology the company
was using. Ascend and Cisco fit the bill.


Other network providers will watch how
Frontier's network plays in the market,
Cisco's Lang says. Frontier's success could
mean more customers for Cisco.

The rise of optical networks will begin on the
expansive scale of Frontier and move to
regional networks and then into branch
offices, Lang says.

''The Frontier deal helps just because people
see that the market is moving that way,''
Lang said. ''We view (the Frontier deal) as a
beginning, not an end.''


(C) Copyright 1998 Investors Business
Daily, Inc.
Metadata: FRO T FON MCIC WCOM CSCO
ASND QWST WMB XCIT YHOO I/4891 I/3574
I/4922 I/3241 E/IBD E/SN1 E/TECH



To: Pat Hughes who wrote (53239)8/31/1998 2:12:00 AM
From: djane  Respond to of 61433
 
NY Times. Learning to Live With a Correction in Technology Stocks [No ASND reference but a good article]

nytimes.com

August 31, 1998

MARKET PLACE

By LAWRENCE M. FISHER

orrections are never fun, but they can provide a kind of clarity
that is in short supply during sustained bull markets. For buyers
of technology stocks, which shared disproportionately in both the long
bull run and last week's market rout, now is a time to reassess
portfolios and adjust as necessary.

"When the market corrects, the important issue is not what you
owned going into the correction, but what your portfolio looks like
when it's over," said Roger B. McNamee, a principal in Integral
Capital Partners, a fund specializing in technology stocks. "As painful
as it is to sell things when they're down, corrections like this are the
last opportunity to get the next up cycle right."

Technology stocks are not homogenous, of
course, and there are different reasons for
buying or selling different sectors.

Some technology companies, notably chip
makers and makers of equipment for making
chips like LSI Logic Corp. and Applied
Materials, but also some software
companies like Adobe Systems. and
disk-drive producers like Seagate Technology, have reported
weakening of their fundamentals from the Asia crisis, and they had
significant declines in their stock prices before the broader correction.
They may not see earnings growth for some time to come, and growth
is what usually fuels technology investments. But analysts say the
correction has made some of these companies so cheap that they are
good values.

One theory of technology investing holds that the dominant players in
any field will never look cheap by conventional measures but will,
over the long term, so far outperform competitors that they are a
compelling investment at nearly any price. Under that theory, at
Friday's closing prices, buyers can now buy stock in Microsoft Corp.
at $105.25, a 12 percent discount to its 52-week high; Intel Corp. at
$77, or 22 percent off the 52-week high, or Dell Computer Corp. at
$118.75, an 8 percent discount.

The Internet stocks, whose sky-high multiples of price to often
nonexistent earnings make Microsoft look cheap, are still expensive
by any conventional measure. But major names like Yahoo, which
closed on Friday at $83.0625, down nearly 20 percent from its
52-week high, and Amazon.com, at $105.8906, down 27 percent,
are at least cheaper than they were before. Many technology
investors want to own them, although many would also like to see a
little more price correction in the group.

"Everybody wants to own Internet stocks and would really like to
own them at one-third the price," McNamee said.

He has instead been buying shares in companies that make software
for corporate operations, selling underperformers to buy market
leaders like Peoplesoft Inc., at $27.25, less than half its 52-week
high; Siebel Systems, now more than a third off at $22.50; I2
Technologies Inc., at $16, down 62 percent, and Citrix Systems, at
$63.50, off 16 percent.

"This is an environment where the premium you pay for owning the
best companies has narrowed dramatically," McNamee said.

James Davidson, a managing director at Hambrecht & Quist, said the
correction could serve to separate momentum investors, who trade
stocks based solely on market movement, from long-term investors,
who buy based on fundamentals. Last week's selloff presents an
opportunity to buy established franchise holders and potential growth
leaders at substantial discounts, if investors are prepared to wait for a
return, Davidson said.

"I don't think you can go wrong buying Microsoft, Cisco, Solectron
or Dell," he said.

Among newer market leaders, he likes Siebel Systems, which makes
sales-force automation software; Rambus, a producer of fast memory
chips, and Advanced Risc Machines, which makes chips for portable
computing devices.

"Are you going to make money in the next few days?" he said.
"Maybe not. But over the next three to six months, no question. It's
not a question of whether these companies are good buys, just when."

Although Wall Street continued bidding up technology stocks through
July 20, when the technology-heavy Nasdaq composite index
peaked, many companies had started to foretell earnings shortfalls this
year when they began to recognize the scale of the Asian economic
crisis and its impact on sales. Now, though, so many companies have
cautioned investors about diminished expectations, and enough
analysts have reduced estimates going forward, that some technology
buyers suspect they may see earnings surprises on the upside in the
third and fourth quarters.

Michael Murphy, editor of the California Technology Stock Letter,
said he spent last Thursday and Friday buying stocks among fallen
semiconductor and software companies, including Applied Materials,
LSI Logic and Adobe, which were all down significantly from their
52-week highs.

"You just don't get prices like that on these quality companies that
often," Murphy said. "Fundamental unit demand for technology
products is still double-digit, and I just don't see that anywhere else in
the economy."

Nevertheless, Murphy said, many technology stocks that trade at high
multiples to earnings or revenues have not dropped far enough to
signal the end of the correction.

"Before this is over in the technology sector you've got to take down
Microsoft and Dell," he said. "The Internet stocks still have a long
way to go. That's the purpose of a correction, to flush this stuff out."

John T. Rossi, a managing director with BancAmerica Robertson
Stephens, said the trading system on Nasdaq, where most technology
stocks are listed, had tended to accelerate falling prices for the group.
In Nasdaq trading, a transaction does not occur until a seller's asking
price finds a matching bid by a buyer.

"In times of selloffs, bids tend to disappear," Rossi said. "It's almost
impossible to sell without a huge discount. Everyone gets skittish at
the same time, so nobody knows how bad it is in a particular stock."

In anticipation of a recovery in the personal computer industry next
year, when Microsoft ships the new version of its Windows NT
software for the corporate-network market, Rossi said, it could be
prudent now to buy stocks in the makers of semiconductors, disk
drives and software, naming Intel, Seagate, Micron Technology,
Autodesk and Adobe.

Recalling that Microsoft shares lost half their value in the crash of
October 1987, he said, "Buying some of these technology stocks
now, when it's nearly impossible to make the body and soul do it, is
not a bad policy."

Copyright 1998 The New York Times Company