Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dorine Essey who wrote (22856)	8/31/1998 8:20:00 AM
From: Brewmeister	Respond to of 31646

Article in Orlando FL paper this weekend. A test was down of the cities traffic lights. Seems when the clocked was pushed to 2000, they all screwed up. Their solution for now appeared to be to roll the clock back to 1972. They wondered what else would be affected. Could you imagine, January 1, 2000 comes and all the major cities have gridlock. Hmmmmm...... Dan

To: Dorine Essey who wrote (22856)	8/31/1998 9:10:00 AM
From: AHM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

I totally confused! Hanifen, Imhoff (the firm that has made a strong buy recommendation for TAVA) stated in an 8/18 Wall Street Journal article its comfort level with $0.04. "Tava spokesman Scott Liolios attributed the rise to a combination of factors: an Aug. 13 reiteration of a "buy" recommendation by Hanifen, Imhoff analyst Russell Welty in Denver; an Aug. 16 interview with Tava Chief Executive John Jenkins in the Venture Returns newsletter; and a rebound by the stock market and by companies tied to solving year 2000 computer problems. In his update, Welty said he was very comfortable with his fourth-quarter estimate of $15 million in revenue and four cents in earnings per share. In the Venture Returns interview, Jenkins emphasized that the prospects for the company are "better than ever." I don't understand why analysts expectations are $0.07 in view of this statement - or is this old data that was never updated by the publishers of this information? I would think that if this is what a principal booster of the company says then analysts should be at that number - most particularly when the whisper number is $0.01 less than Hanifen, Imhoff's analyst's statement. Anyone care to comment?