Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (7154)	8/31/1998 8:09:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

A voice of caution, as Zeev, says, that is the current atmosphere, I do believe. Just an optimist. Chuca

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (7154)	8/31/1998 11:57:00 PM
From: Tim Hall	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Richard, << GPGI must have a good handle (lab work) on what they are sending out to the refiner, they wouldn't be increasing production if there were problems IMO. >> This is a very profound statement. GPGI should do an assay on every shipment they send. Sabin should do a similar assay on every shipment they receive. Any discrepencies would be settled by an umpire assay performed by an independent bonded lab. This should be just standard business. I would have thought that these assays would be available almost immediately. I wonder why they haven't been released with the shipment information? GPGI is also developing a tailings pond or waste pile at this time. They have to dispose of leached ore. Since no one that I have spoken to with AZ water quality is aware of a permit, (similar to the one Maxam posted on their website), it would be nice if GPGI would post theirs also. This is needed in AZ on any land, federal, state or private. Tim