To: ANALYST10 who wrote (23925 ) 8/31/1998 10:46:00 PM From: RocketMan Respond to of 50264
You are the one who just brought up the stock detective, not me. Why are you so interested in highlighting them? Do you work for them? I don't have much of an opinion of them one way or the other, but I would note that their piece on DGIV seemed pretty shallow to me. Their main point was that DGIV is betting its future on Mordovia. In fact, Digitcom is trying to establish itself internationally, in something like 13 countries so far. Mordovia has not even been mentioned lately, but for some reason stock detective never went back to update their story to include all the other countries, or their last series of announcements. But regardless, stock detective has a right to their opininion. So does the Wall Street Journal and Internet Week, both of which carried positive stories about DGIV. On the "rose colored glasses" theory, I have said often that DGIV is a high risk, though high potential payoff investment. If this is rose colored, so be it. The fact that I am invested in DGIV implies that I think it is a good investment for me, in a well balanced portfolio. As far as I know it is still ok in this country to make that decision for myself. I have also encouraged others to do what is best for them, buy, sell, hold, whatever. WIth you, I find it interesting that you hold no DGIV, you think the company is a scam, and you continue to post on here, but you only appear when the stock is down or is going down. Makes me suspicious. However, I do have an open mind, I think we all do. This is not a cult, it is an investment board. Get over it. If you have something factual to present, present it. Otherwise, bye!