Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : HONG KONG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bosco who wrote (2259)	9/1/1998 5:06:00 PM
From: Ron Bower	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2951

Thread, Running thru this simple mind of mine is the question: Isn't it better for the governemnt to step in to protect the economy and prevent the insolvency of the banking system than to stay out of the system and have to deal with insolvent banks, e.g. Japan, Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Russia, the US, etc.? And possibly South America FWIW, Ron

To: Bosco who wrote (2259)	9/1/1998 7:00:00 PM
From: Ramsey Su	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2951

Bosco, OT - Tibet I think China has a simple solution. All they have to do is admit that they have no idea how to deal with Tibet. Since the US knows everything, China will hand Tibet over to the US, to do whatever we wish. Now we are going to hand Tibet to the Dalai Lama? How about freedom of religion? Is Tibet going to separate church and state? Is Tibet going to have a democratic government or is some kid going to be the next "president" because he is chosen? In fact, what form of government would they have? They will violate everything that we believe in and documented in the constitution. But we do have all the answers. We will just send them Richard Gere. Ramsey