SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton -- doomed & wagging, Japan collapses, Y2K bug, etc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (46)9/1/1998 9:36:00 PM
From: SOROS  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1151
 
Keep in mind that THERE IS a global leader RIGHT NOW, simply waiting to make his grand entrance in the world scene. I personally think the SOLUTION to Y2K will be what he brings to the table AFTER a period of total chaos. This will garner him the worship he so greatly desires.

Paris, Monday, August 31, 1998 ...International Herald Tribune

A Scramble for Responses to Crisis

Weakness at the Top Clouds World's Search for Solutions By Nicholas D. Kristof New York Times Service

TOKYO - It is sometimes said that extraordinary times produce extraordinary leaders. But if so, where are they?

Many experts in foreign affairs worry about what they see as a perilous combination of Brobdingnagian challenges to international stability and Lilliputian authority among the political leaders tackling them.

With the Asian meltdown spreading to Russia and undermining Europe, China and Latin America, some experts fret about the risk of a severe global downturn, perhaps another depression, with incalculable
political and military risks. But just as the threats to world order seem unusually grave and complex, leaders in major capitals appear unusually enfeebled.

''Today we are on the verge of massive international dislocations, which may have started in one country, Thailand, but have created the real prospect of global financial instability,'' said Jeffrey Garten, dean of the Yale School of Management.

''The reason this is potentially calamitous is that no one is in charge.''

That is something that President Bill Clinton might discuss with President Boris Yeltsin at their summit meeting in Moscow this week.

But the metaphor of a summit meeting seems inappropriately robust; these days the most fitting location for any meeting of the Group of Seven industrialized nations and Russia might be a hospital ward, where presidents could compare scars and take bets on who will survive longest.

Mr. Clinton is so hobbled by scandal that he cannot even launch missiles against alleged Afghan-based Arab terroristswithout widespread doubts that the missiles were not at least in part an attempt to change the subject.

In Moscow, the uncertainty is not whether Mr. Yeltsin will run again in 2000 (he said last week he would not), but whether he can even finish his present term. In Germany, which has much at risk in Russia's
moribund economy, Helmut Kohl may be unseated in elections next month after 16 years as chancellor of Europe's powerhouse.

Prime Minister Keizo Obuchi of Japan is limping along in his first weeks in office, looking a bit dazed and struggling to show some national leadership for the first time in his 35 years in Parliament.

Even in China, President Jiang Zemin has been humbled by severe floods and by an economy that has been slowing ineluctably.

''Domestic, social and economic forces are overwhelming political leaders everywhere,'' said Michel Oksenberg, a professor of international relations at Stanford University. Mr. Oksenberg argues that the challenges to international order can be addressed only at the political level and that there is no correcting mechanism that will ensure that everything works out well in the end.

''I don't think the world is on auto-pilot,'' he said. ''If so, I'd hate to say where the plane is headed.''

The political scientist Francis Fukuyama published a famous essay in 1989 arguing that the collapse of communism marked ''the end of history.'' The great debates that had animated history, he suggested in that essay and in a subsequent book, had been resolved. But now he has fresh doubts.

''The past few months have been really the first time since the beginning of the decade that I felt that I could really be proven wrong in the argument that I laid out in 'The End of History,''' Mr. Fukuyama mused in a telephone interview.

''There are two things on the horizon that I think are really quite scary: that the Asian crisis could broaden into a global depression, in which case all bets are off about everything; and essentially, that
Russia could fail in its attempt to Westernize and go backward seriously. Both of those may really develop.''

A third and related challenge, one that many experts cite as requiring concentrated efforts by the world's leaders, is the threat of proliferation of nuclear arms and other weapons of mass destruction.

Some analysts suggest that India may have been successful in surprising the world with its nuclear tests this spring in part because officials were not paying enough attention. And experts also worry about Pakistan as it joins Russia on the list of nuclear powers with disintegrating economies.

What should the world's leaders be doing about these challenges? The answers vary, although everyone agrees that the first priority for people like Mr. Yeltsin and Mr. Obuchi is to stop the self-inflicted injuries that are threatening international stability. Mr. Yeltsin's withdrawal from day-to-day decision-making and his firing of his prime minister and economic team have worsened the collapse of the ruble, and Mr. Obuchi is so weak that six bills vital to Japan's economic restructuring program are stuck in Parliament, aggravating the Asian crisis.

As for the United States, its economy is the envy of the world, but Mr. Clinton has been unable to wrest money from Congress to replenish the International Monetary Fund.

There remains a vigorous debate within America about whether the IMF has done more harm than good, but many foreign officials say that Mr. Clinton's failure to deliver the money has limited the Fund's ability
to combat the crisis in Russia and has, more broadly, added to the unease in global markets. Already, some analysts are blaming Mr. Kohl and Mr. Clinton for not having done more to bail out Russia when its
reformist economic team was still in power.

Moreover, many government officials worry that if the U.S. economy falters, Mr. Clinton will be too weakened to resist protectionist pressures from Congress.

There are apparently several reasons why strong political leaders are scarce today. Some of those
reasons may be more profound than quirks like the strong libido of one president in Washington and the
weak heart of another in Moscow.

''You can deride the personalities involved, but I think something much more fundamental is going on,'' Mr. Oksenberg said.

International public opinion surveys, for example, have shown declining confidence in government in recent years, not just in the United States but also in Canada and most of Europe. Bipartisanship on
foreign affairs has faded. Journalism has become more aggressive and cynical as commentary has
expanded with the technological capacity to deliver it.

Improvements in technology and communications have also cost political leaders their monopolies on information and weaponry, arguably empowering citizens and terrorists at the expense of presidents. The private sector has gained prestige and self-confidence, emerging as a rival force to guide policy.

''If there's a saving grace, a force that could compensate for weak political leadership, it's business,'' said M.Y. Yoshino, a professor at Harvard Business School. ''Still, that can't compensate enough. What can you do when the ruble devalues 10 percent overnight?''



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (46)9/4/1998 3:09:00 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
Wall Street Journal - 09/04/98

By GREGORY ZUCKERMAN and PATRICK MCGEEHAN Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

NEW YORK -- With Wall Street firms and hedge funds still reeling from heavy losses in emerging markets, the focus of concern about red ink is widening to include several domestic fixed-income sectors, including corporate bonds and mortgage-backed securities.

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Thursday became the latest of the major financial institutions to reveal how badly it has been hit in the recent market turmoil. The firm took the unusual step of forecasting
third-quarter earnings of $151 million, down from $197 million a year earlier, in part because of a $60 million after-tax loss caused by the volatile emerging-markets sector.

Separately, famed hedge-fund manager Leon Cooperman's Omega Advisors LP has incurred substantial losses of its own, investors close to firm said. Omega's Overseas Partners fund shed 22.3% of its value, or $446 million, in August, according to these investors. The fund is down 14% through Aug. 31, but retains substantial cash balances and hasn't experienced any margin calls.

"August was generally a bloodbath for hedge funds with emerging markets or Russian exposure," said Lois Peltz, of MAR/Hedge, a hedge-fund tracking firm.

But even as word was spreading about the latest emerging-markets problems, some analysts and others were calling attention to potential damage much closer to home.

"Broadly for the Street, the story is broader than emerging markets," said Guy Moszkowski, an analyst at Salomon Smith Barney. "The impact of the increase in [yield] spread on corporate, high-yield and
other domestic bonds is probably more important for many firms than what happened in emerging markets."

The corporate-bond market has tumbled in recent weeks amid investor fears that a recession may be looming. And mortgage-backed securities have also been weak, as falling interest rates spark worries
that higher mortgage refinancings will cripple mortgage-backed bonds.

Adding to concern is the way many firms try to protect their corporate-bond and mortgage-backed-bond portfolios against a move in interest rates by selling Treasurys securities short, or selling borrowed Treasurys in the hope of profiting by buying them back at a lower price. The strategy has worked wonders in recent years because corporate bonds and Treasurys have moved more or less in unison.

Not lately, however. Treasurys have rallied in the last six weeks, amid a global flight to quality, but other, riskier bonds have weakened. As a result, many Wall Street firms have suffered losses from their bond holdings, which have fallen in value, and their Treasury short positions, which have also lost money.

"In the last couple of weeks almost all trading desks have been damaged by both widening spreads and a simultaneous Treasury rally," said Mark Patterson, head of corporate bonds at Credit Suisse First
Boston. "It's been a double whammy."

"To say it's been hard to hedge would be an understatement," said Grant Kvalheim, global head of debt capital markets at Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.

Industry talk points to losses in the tens of millions of dollars at most bond houses on Wall Street. Much of the speculation has centered on Merrill Lynch & Co., the firm with by far the biggest position in the corporate-bond market.

Merrill has repeatedly declined to talk about any trading losses, even as the firm's stock price has sunk about 40% since mid-July. Merrill's silence, while most investment and commercial banks have
announced losses caused by all the turmoil, has fueled questions about the firm's experience.

Some Wall Street executives have suggested that Merrill may be hoping to recover some of the losses they assume it has recorded before announcing results for the quarter.

A Merrill spokesman reiterated Thursday that the firm has a policy of not discussing its results "intra-quarter."

Some analysts are estimating the impact on Merrill's earnings by extrapolating from other firms' announcements. Mr. Moszkowski last week trimmed his estimate of Merrill's third-quarter earnings by
19% to $1.05, from $1.29 a share. That translates to a hit of more than $80 million, but Mr. Moszkowski says the real impact "might be bigger."

One of Merrill's major competitors, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., said earlier this week that the damage in its fixed-income businesses will shave about $110 million off its net income for the quarter
that ended Aug. 31. Some of that came from corporate and junk bonds, but a big chunk came from leveraged investments in emerging markets made by the firm's asset-management unit.

The trading losses at many Wall Street firms have been so substantial that many are suddenly reluctant to quote reasonable prices, or make a market in corporate bonds, say some institutional investors. This
has reduced liquidity, sending the corporate-bond market into its worst crisis in years.

"Wall Street brokers are extremely reluctant to take on additional inventory," said Greg Hopper, a portfolio manager at Bankers Trust Global Investment Management. "It's not unusual in bad markets, but
it hasn't been this bad since 1990 and 1991, and it frustrates me."

"There's been an improvement in liquidity in the last day or two, but the adjustment in the corporate market in the last two weeks has been more severe than that of the stock market, and in many cases
Wall Street was caught with too much on their books," said Brad Tank, director of fixed income at Strong Capital Management.

Indeed, the $183 billion in corporate bonds issued this year is already a record, according to First Boston, as is the $251 billion in government-agency issuance.

Because brokerage firms usually feel an obligation to make a market in bonds they underwrite, many have been forced to buy back bonds amid the market's sell-off, traders say.

"Standing by a bond is your calling card to investors and future issuers, and it hurts your reputation if you don't make a bid for a bond as the market plunges," said a trader. "But this means losses,
especially if your hedges don't work."

Treasury Securities

U.S. Treasurys posted moderate gains on another weakening in stocks.

In late trading, the benchmark 30-year bond rose 17/32 point, or $5.3125 for a bond with $1,000 face value, at 102 29/32. The bond's yield, which moves in the opposite direction of its price, fell to 5.297% from 5.332% late Wednesday.

As in recent sessions, the bond market followed the stock market's gyrations.

A speech by the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank's president, Robert Parry, was generally seen as neutral for Treasurys. Mr. Parry said recent declines in U.S. stocks will likely slow the economy and rein in consumer spending, and reiterated that global financial turmoil still poses a threat to the U.S. economy.

Friday, investors and traders will scrutinize the Labor Department's latest monthly report on growth in U.S. nonfarm payrolls, looking for evidence that wage pressures may be increasing.

A Dow Jones-CNBC survey of economists shows that August payrolls are expected to have risen by 375,000, up from a 66,000 gain in July. Unemployment is seen declining to 4.4% from 4.5% in July.

In other credit markets:

Municipal bonds finished a lifeless session 1/8-point higher but continued to underperform U.S. Treasurys.

U.S. brokerage paper widened in the corporate bond market on news of sector losses due to the Russian economic fallout.

Mortgage-backed securities inched up 2/32 in thin trading.

In the Eurobond market, Fannie Mae reopened its global benchmark program to offer $2 billion of five-year notes.



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (46)9/6/1998 2:32:00 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
BBC - 09/06/98

President Bill Clinton has returned from his five-day trip to Europe to find criticism of his conduct in the Monica Lewinsky affair still growing.

On Thursday a long-time ally of Mr Clinton's, Democratic Senator Joseph Lieberman, denounced his relationship with the former White House worker as immoral.

Senator Lieberman said some sort of "public rebuke" was called for although he said it would be premature until independent counsel Kenneth Starr reports on whether Mr Clinton has committed any
impeachable offences over the Lewinsky affair.

That statement forced President Clinton into his first public apology for his behaviour. During his visit to Ireland, he said he was "very sorry".

But Mr Lieberman had opened the way for other senior Democrats to make their own criticism of the president.

Florida Senator Bob Graham called the relationship "an irreversible stain" on the Clinton presidency.

He told reporters the president had "not sufficiently apologized" for his behaviour, nor had he understood "the degree to which the trust relationship he must have with the American people has been ripped" by
his actions.

The Governor of Maryland, Parris N. Glendening, distanced himself from President Clinton on Saturday, cancelling a fund-raiser with the president that once promised to provide hundreds of thousands of dollars
for the governor's ee-election bid.

Democratic party officials said the move hurt the White House as Maryland is a strongly Democratic state and Governor Glendening had initially defended him over the scandal.

However one critic, the Democratic Party chairman and Governor of Colorado, Roy Romer, said President Clinton's apology was "helpful".

Economic downturn would spell disaster

Correspondents say that for Mr Clinton - whose own election motto in 1992 was "It's the economy, stupid" - the health of the economy is vital if he is to overcome the Lewinsky scandal.

Last week the chairman of the US Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan, warned that America could not expect to remain immune from the economic crisis hitting Russia and East Asia.

On Saturday in his weekly radio address Mr Clinton sought to reassure Americans after another bad week on Wall Street.

He said: "The bottom line is that for all the quicksilver volatility in the world's financial markets, the American economy is on the right track."

Mr Clinton pointed out 365,000 new jobs were created last month.



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (46)9/6/1998 7:18:00 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
Someone sent me this:

07/01/1998: The first day of fiscal 1999 for 46 of 50 states.
Minimal problems expected.

10/01/1998: The beginning of fiscal 1999 for the federal
government. Problems expected.

01/01/1999: Widely expected to cause data and software failures
globally.

04/01/1999: Japan, Canada, Britain, New York state, Qatar and
South Africa will begin their fiscal years. Problems anyone?

07/01/1999: The first day of fiscal 2000 for 46 of 50 states. Smooth sailing?

09/09/1999: Programmers have used this code (9999) to store a
wide variety of files. Some programmers used 9999 to denote
infinity, others have used it to trigger a computer test for shut down.

08/22/1999: GPS rollover: the "atomic clock dilemma".

10/01/1999: The beginning of the federal government's fiscal year
2000.

01/01/2000: Saturday, which will probably be like adding insult to
injury.

01/03/2000: Monday; should be interesting.

02/29/2000: A leap year. Many programmers will have missed this.



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (46)9/6/1998 7:30:00 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
Penns Grove, NJ (August 4) - Noted Y2k pundit Rick Cowles declared himself "the first official casualty of the Y2k bug" after
breaking his foot last week while running to grab a Y2k-related
phone call.

"It was a stupid move," Cowles sheepishly explained. "I heard a
message being left on my machine by a close Y2k associate, and ran
up the stairs to get the call before he hung up. Unfortunately, and no
pun intended, I missed a step in that process and whacked my foot."

Though recovery time will be 6 to 8 weeks, Cowles hasn't placed
himself on the Y2k disabled list. He's been spotted in Raleigh and
Hartford over the past week giving client presentations, big blue leg
cast and all.