Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Wise who wrote (8203)	9/2/1998 12:24:00 AM
From: craig crawford	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

>> At this point I couldn't salvage enough to be worth getting out anyway. << Ahh, but you could have three times as much as you do now if you would've have just quit kidding yourself a month ago. Think about that for a minute. If you would have come to the conclusion that this company is utterly worthless ONLY 1 MONTH AGO you would have 3 TIMES your money. I'm going to tell you one more time. Now listen good. Sell now before you have 1/3 less money a few months from now. You can't say I didn't try to help you David. I still am. Swim away from this sinking ship as fast as you can.

To: David Wise who wrote (8203)	9/2/1998 12:44:00 AM
From: mr. ed	Respond to of 10479

<Apparently Mr.Ed decided that it meant they needed to do something because they weren't getting sales. Could just mean there was a vacancy.> Well if no one is there to sell then you get no sales. Did the old salesman leave because he could not sell or did he see few sales in the future? just a thought regards mr ed.

To: David Wise who wrote (8203)	9/2/1998 1:11:00 AM
From: Afaq Sarwar	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10479

David, I share your sentiments. I would suggest you call few people at the company. Have a list of all the hard question that you want answered. Ask the questions, and insist on getting answers. Make your decision based on how they respond to your questions, what their answers are, and if those answers appear credible to you. I would suggest that you at least talk to Dr. Cheng, John Gorman, David Pawlak, and John Mason. I have done the same. I realize that there are no guaranties. However, based on what I have learned, I am confident that I am making the right decision by staying long. Consequently, as of today I have the same approx. the same number of shares as I had before the reverse split. Regards. Afaq Sarwar

To: David Wise who wrote (8203)	9/2/1998 3:25:00 PM
From: Shivram Hala	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

> assume that the 1 for 3 reverse split was an ill-advised attempt to > keep the price over $5.00 so they could get NMS listing which would > have Now that we are at 2 will we have another 3 for 1 reverse split (and another talk from Par saying that "I never expected a reverse split would tank the stock"). So what happens to the NMS listing now. I think FIBR should announce a reverse split in the lines of 10:1. It'll be a sure fire way for me to get back my lost money.