Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wild Rose who wrote (33946)	9/2/1998 10:52:00 AM
From: Paunch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Elry, You are sure right there, every time these guys post they show more of their ignorance to anyone that knows anything at all. Have you tried ti figure out just what they are trying to do by bad mouthing a .05 stock that is only being sold at a brokerage firm, they must need IPM to go under completely for them to profit. Paunch

To: Wild Rose who wrote (33946)	9/2/1998 1:44:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

That is an evil lie elry. I insulted Jackson twice if not three times and he didn't even ask for it. I would like to add that all who riposte here are incompetent boobs with an attitude problem and shrunken members. I say this without prejudice and after assessing the situations with great care and dispassion. Anybody still posting on the IPMCF forum after the stock has shown itself to be an embarrassing fraud has to have the mental co-efficient of anencephalic flatworm. In addition, on any index of quality, if the dress habits, IQ, bankbook, personal morality, choice in friends and style of preferred motorcar of the average poster on this thread, were added up and assessed it would be apparent that criminal proceedings to protect society from further harm would be urgently advised. echarter@vianet.on.ca