Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bill Wexler's Profits of DOOM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AHM who wrote (2300)	9/2/1998 5:26:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Respond to of 4634

AHM, these are opinion boards. That which is posted here is opinion. It would have to be proved that Wexler's allegations specifically damaged TAVA, and that he knew for a fact that TAVA is not a fraud. The burden of proof is not on Bill. BTW, we've already had this conversation, and I'm kind of tired of summer repeats. I'd suggest you review the thread around August 18 or 19. Start with this post: Message 5543485 Barb

To: AHM who wrote (2300)	9/2/1998 5:30:00 PM
From: Peter V	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4634

<<Mr. Wexler has never submitted facts to support his claims of fraud on the part of Tava and its management. >> So? This is an opinion thread, not a court of law. In order for TAVA to sue Bill, TAVA, not Bill, would have to prove that Bill spoke untruths about them, and the only way for them to do that will be to prove that they are not a fraud. Only after they make out such a case would the burden of proof shift to Bill to show that in fact TAVA is a fraud. If you think TAVA is going to lay out their entire world for Bill to take discovery to determine whether they are/were a fraud, you are delusional. [edit - I guess I type slower than you Barb] <g>