Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Epic EAS.v (formerly Epic ERB.v and Safari SIR.v) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: virginijus poshkus who wrote (2581)	9/3/1998 1:12:00 AM
From: the truth	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3335

Another week, and no news. We should take a poll. 1)who thinks this is a scam? 2)who thinks they are in negotiations with anyone at this point? 3)who thinks that they will get a deal before Martians land on the planet. 4) who thinks this is legitimate, with real potential, with a deal ready within the next few months? 5)who cares? truth

To: virginijus poshkus who wrote (2581)	9/3/1998 9:48:00 PM
From: B. Thomson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3335

>Bob, > >Can you please post another message for me. Thanks in advance. > >"Again, I am posting this message for Small Fish." > >"I DO believe in the validity of the gas play, and have believed in this area from before ERB but because of the company's, north of border, belief in the area who has always had a very honest reputation and an excellent geologist and I have known this company for about 8 years and own their stock. (It seems to me I read or heard somewhere that there were 90 wells drilled on the North Slope before they hit.) The geology where they have drilled on the north side is different from the area where ERB drilled. And their belief is unshaken and reinforced in this area. >Also, I believe Ken is an extremely honest person, and that he is >diligently working for the benefit of the shareholders. > >The presence of the old management worries me a lot. Also, the >possibility of being surprised by something that cannot be foreseen make me nervous. (And the phrasing "holes in it:" and "managed" doesn't help my nervousness.) > >I have been averaging down to the limit of my "extremely small" >ability. So call me a fool? If I am, I DON'T believe that it will be because the play is not valid. I believe that it is very valid (and this is keeping me in it), >And since I am expressing my opinion, I also was upset by the quoting of conversations and, especially from the person who has worked through very trying conditions, self-sacrificingly so, and again I believe very honestly and has gone MANY extra miles for us. Also, would not like to see any more "innuendos" posted; only facts. Sincerely, Small Fish"

To: virginijus poshkus who wrote (2581)	9/3/1998 10:11:00 PM
From: B. Thomson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3335

Hi Vargas. I know the feeling. Not at all impressed at what's transpired over the past while. Still hoping for a miracle though. Someone has accumulated a fair bit of stock over the last few months and now with all the recent option issues, maybe some good news is coming. I'm still skeptical though even with Ken S. at the helm. However, I'm still holding all my shares. Don't know if that means I'm really, really stupid, or that I actually believe there is some substance to this play. I guess the potential is still there. Time will tell! Keep in touch and don't give up on Portugal. I'm still planning to go. Just not sure what year! Bob