Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Bema(Bgo) and Arizona Star -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (9687)	9/2/1998 9:56:00 PM
From: grampa	Respond to of 10482

We may not agree on everything, but someone that admits that "I'm old and a little dense as well as mentally slow"---can't be all bad. As a matter of fact, it sounds like grandma talking to me!! :-) grampa

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (9687)	9/3/1998 8:03:00 AM
From: John Soileau	Respond to of 10482

Never mind. I posed some questions to you a few posts back--basically, what you used to support your sweeping conclusion about ECM. You didn't directly answer the questions, but your subsequent dialogue with others strongly indicated that there is nothing but personal speculation supporting your quite absolute and sweeping conclusion that ECM's deposits are not and cannot be viable. So, without responding to me, you provided an answer to my inquiry--indirectly. If there's more to support your statements than rank speculation, by all means put it out there. I WANT TO KNOW if we're all wasting our time with dead deposits! But if you really have no factual basis for your declaration that ECM's properties will never be viable, why in the world did you make such an absolute statement here?! I'd find that kind of behavior extremely obnoxious. With all due respect to my elders, I would summarize by saying: Put up or shut up. Regards, John