SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (15888)9/2/1998 11:54:00 PM
From: Bill Harmond  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
>>some analyst or money manager on CNBC aroud 6 eastern that stated AMZN had good fundamentals.

Signing Michael Jordan when he was 7 years old would have seemed expensive, too.



To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (15888)9/3/1998 12:02:00 AM
From: zax  Respond to of 164684
 
I just wanted to mention there was some analyst or money manager on CNBC aroud 6 eastern that stated AMZN had good fundamentals. I was eating dinner and almost choked. I wish I could recall the name. Anyhow, he suggested you buy it based on its fundamentals. That was the first I have ever heard that one.

Thats nothing Glenn...

Check out TMFJeff's FoolPort analysis tonight on fool.com

He is now claiming that AOL is fairly valued based upon

"basic valuation principles"

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHA

I'd also suggest you check out boards.fool.com

A small note about why comparing AOL to CATV companies for valuation purposes is almost as bad as comparing AMZN to (BKS+BGP).

TMF is such a RILEY..err RIOT! :)



To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (15888)9/3/1998 4:10:00 AM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Glen<I just wanted to mention there was some analyst or money manager on CNBC aroud 6 eastern that stated AMZN had good fundamentals.>
It was probably someone from Morgan Stanely. They have an interest in Amzn. A huge one.
Trust me.