Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (3650)	9/3/1998 4:18:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Bill, OK I didnt know that about Hillary having to use the name Clinton at the Rose law firm. David's question to me implied she only recently changed her name, in fact I thought that too, I seem to recall her as Hillary Rodham only a few years ago. If you are correct then yes, that is not acceptable. However she was also reported to be one of the top lawyers in the country, having represented a number of Washington clients on a bunch of cases (I dont know any specifics here), are you suggesting this was all as a result of her being the wife of the Gov of Arkansas? And if her marriage was the only reason she made partner, then do you think anybody would want her representation (I mean, if she was actually a bad lawyer) Also, on this issue of commodities profits, isnt it possible that her broker did all of that without her knowledge. For example, I have no idea about all the individual trades that my broker does for me during the month, and some months he is up a huge amt (or down), its not like I suspect criminal activity. Michelle