Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Thread Morons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Henry Volquardsen who wrote (4216)	9/3/1998 5:03:00 PM
From: Rande Is	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12810

RE: Ongoing argument 1. I never said you over reacted. What I said was, "So while I apologize for jumping all over you, I do not apologize for the reasons for my "overreacting." 2. I never said USTI was in business 10 years. What I said was, "CHALLENGE: Find me one other stock that has been in business more than 10 years, sells a product that is in demand, shows a recent profitable quarter and sells for anywhere under a quarter. . . and I'll buy it too." Correct answer is as I stated. USTI was established 20 years ago. 3. I agreed with cautionary warnings. Pennies are too risky to be considered "investments." Perhaps 90 percent of them are fraudulent. They are merely gambles. Just like buying a Lottery ticket or pulling the handle on the one-armed-bandit. Most people should never buy penny stocks. But they shouldn't smoke either, tho I suspect they always will. I suggest we stop beating this dead horse. Rande Is