Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cymer (CYMI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FJB who wrote (19303)	9/3/1998 7:49:00 PM
From: BillyG	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25960

Bob, sorry to drag this out, but: <<In that case and it seems many others, the law firm was its own client. In that case, a much larger shareholder did not care to be a plaintiff to the case, so the judge did not allow "the firm" to be a co-lead plaintiff.>> Actually, in that case the much larger plaintiff wanted to be a plaintiff -- it just didn't want Lerach and his slimy bunch to represent them. Wisconsin wanted to be the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, and they wanted to be represented by their own band of lawyers. I would prefer that this lawsuit just go away. I'm sure that you do to. If we can't do that, then I'm all for trying to yank the case away from Lerach.