Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (1509)	9/3/1998 9:08:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

The nuclear family concept is economically feasible if the priorities are set properly. JLA

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (1509)	9/4/1998 9:46:00 AM
From: Jim Roof	Respond to of 67261

<<Well that depends on what you consider the family values platform to be. If it is what I think it is, which is, advocating a nuclear family as the only acceptable one (mom, dad and kids etc), with some underlying subtext of "one parent stays home", then yes I think it is stupid.>> Nobody has said that one parent MUST stay at home but from a psychological and sociological standpoint it is no longer debatable that a child reared with a parent at home stands a better chance in the real world than one who spends his formative years in the tender loving confines of a daycare center. <<It has not been economically feasible for 2 decades.>> And who might be to blame for that? Perhaps those who require the average worker to put in almost 4 months work per year to finance the cost of social engineering? Jim