Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MTEI - Mountain Energy - No BASHING Allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hope who wrote (10181)	9/5/1998 10:33:00 AM
From: SCOOBEY-DO	Respond to of 11684

First of all, I want to thank everyone that is working so hard to get to the bottom of this mess. I hate to say it but I didn't keep up in reading the MTEI thread because there was so much "off topic" going on. My only question is, Why has Janice been so interested in this company all this time when she said herself that she was not a stockholder of MTEI? I am a stockholder of MTEI, but wish that I sold it when I stopped following the information on the thread. Thanks again for all the work that you have been doing, and the thanks includes one to Janice. Scoobey

To: Hope who wrote (10181)	9/5/1998 10:54:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 11684

I do think though that you were playing the Christonson card and did not know the whole list of scammers and scammees. In my first post on the old ICVI thread I asked only: "Is this company operational". That was the first thing that interested me; apparently it wasn't, and yet all kinds of wild projections were being made in the press releases. "A half-billion dollar company in 3-6 months" was one of my favorites. Huh? Just not possible. Their source of potential--and very necessary--financing was not divulged, either. Though contributors to the thread insisted that there was one, nobody really seemed to know what it was. As things turned out, both of these questions turned out to be very much to the point. At that time, though, I thought the problem might just be inexperienced and incompetent management. Then jhild and I started looking into the Christensen connection. You're absolutely right: we both focused on that, rather than on Uselton himself. And Uselton, as we later learned, could have stood some looking at. A lot, in fact. As an example, on one of the last MTEI office open for business days, you knew about some 2:00 meeting. Not something an outsider would know. As I said in my last post, after the SEC stopped trading in the stock, several people on various sides of the issue did get in touch with me. It goes without saying that I wouldn't have known about the meeting if I hadn't been told. I've sometimes been asked to keep sources confidential, and I've been willing to do so. I do try to make it clear in those cases that I'm relaying information received, and that I have no way of verifying it independently. Hope this helps...