SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (16197)9/5/1998 2:19:00 PM
From: IceShark  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
Glenn, Your conclusions on this Baker & Taylor thing can't be right, i.e. paying for current purchases of CGS with stock. If it is we have a disaster which will devastate AMZN in short order - shareholder lawsuits, SEC, you name it. Just think, how would you value the stock to be fair to all the competing interests? Even AMZN isn't that dumb.

If I were the audit partner on AMZN, I'd withdraw, rather than spend the next 10 years in litigation.

So, it must be related to some sort of founders shares or joint venture setup. Wonder how we sort this out?

Regards, IS



To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (16197)9/6/1998 2:39:00 AM
From: zax  Respond to of 164684
 
DogReprint Follows:

boards.fool.com

------------------>

Get a grip, Zax. I personally think that the Fool should dump AMZN, but it's their money and their risk. I don't buy that the Fool is hyping AMZN (how many small investors would have to be actively trading on 2,000,000+ share days at 100 shares or less per trade given the price?).

I appreciate your opinion, Phool, but I flatly disagree with your logic.

TMF appears to be cleverly hyping stocks to attract attention from both institutional AND small investors causing the stocks to rise by pyramid principles.

Thus, rather than coming off as a respectable news organization, instead, they come off as low life vermin like this:

freeyellow.com